Send As SMS

Friday, May 19, 2006

Now Playing On IFC: Cruising

Cruising



Fuck! IFC the Independent Film Channel showed a letterbox UNCUT version of Cruising, Starring Al Pacino, on TV. May 6,7,15,16! And I missed it all damn it. This sucks so bad for me because you cannot get Cruising, directed by William Friedkin's from The Exorcist, unless you scrape the bottom of the VHS bin and then all you will find is an edited (family friendly) version. The theatrical release had full on fisting, blowjobs and fucking and actual scenes of South of Market San Francisco leather bars during the hay days long gone by. I am not kidding you when I say this really needs to be released on DVD. It's the only movie that not only referred to Gay Leather but actually represented a bit of it in all it's raw glory. Not that great of a thriller though but very much in line with say your typical David Lynch film. Raw and confusing at the end as it was at the beginning. Well, let's hope IFC plays it again and keep an eye out. Good crap for TV that is!

Monday, May 15, 2006

Book Review: Steven Zeeland ~ The Masculine Marine

Marine_masculine

"My methodology has not changed: I befriended servicemen, sometimes in an intimate way, in part to win their trust so that I could ask them terribly personal questions, and in part just because I liked them. The interviews included here represent those Marines I learned the most from." - Steven "Sleaze On A Stick" Zeeland: The Masculine Marine


(They Love To See You Shoot) I Love A Man In Uniform



It was 1987 when I entered the Navy at the age 24. This is actually pretty late in the game for someone to decide to "join up" but from a combination of unemployment and watching my small circle of friends die or go back home devastated by the AIDS crisis. I figured I was already feeling like I was isolated and depressed so why not do that in a constructive way and get the hell away from the San Francisco Bay Area in the process. I had been raised an Army Brat, I knew the score and I figured I could handle not only "joining up" but in some ways I wanted to prove to myself and maybe my own father that even being Gay, I could "make it".

After deciding that this was the path I was going to take I immediately started to seriously cover some of my tracks from the past 5 years. I proceeded to tell everyone that I was going to use as people who could be contacted for any background checks explaining that yes I was going to lie about being Gay and would they cover for me etc etc. Interesting discussions, but you would not believe how agreeable and supportive people can be when you’re honest about being dishonest to the government. I eventually would obtain some pretty damn high clearances and I still believe someone had to know I was Gay.

A night right before I was sent to the Navy boot camp Great Lakes near Chicago, I and a group of new recruits being shipped out and the recruiters got together for what can mostly be called a drunken night out with the guys. Now mind you, a few of these guys were a bit underage to be drinking but we conveniently met on a now defunct Naval airbase nearby. Anyway, I got a little too drunk and ended up crashing at the hunky (Why do they always pick good looking recruiters?), married, head recruiter’s apartment. I remember him later that evening when we crashed standing over me in his tighty whiteys eyeing me laying there like he was deciding to make a come on or not and asking me what a good looking guy like myself was doing "joining up" at my age. That was one of my first memories of what would be a rather interesting career choice. I of course being the experienced some what freaked out Gay guy, did everything I could to act totally out of it to diffuse the situation because the last thing I was going to do was start that routine so early in the game. Yes, the game.

Steven Zeeland has written three books (Army, Navy, and Marines) of interviews he has done with relatively young military personnel who were also Gay. Barrack Buddies And Soldier Lovers published in 1993, Sailors And Sexual Identity published in 1995, and The Masculine Marine published in published in 1996. Now I personally could group all three of these books despite the forced attempt to supposedly explore different subjects into the same review because in reality they cover the same territory with the same style and structure and use some of the same individual's stories. Talking about one book would be the same as talking about any other book in the series.

Topgun_man_in_uniform

Steven starts each of the books setting up the various subjects with some off topic, mumbo jumbo and intellectually suspect reasons he wrote them. To summarize that reason is simple; basically he did it to justify his military fetish of only dating young, stupid, inexperienced, military guys. How’s that for a kicker? My point being, that even with a few exceptions here and there for the most part you are going to run into interview after interview of young good looking guys just really getting the hang of being young and Gay in the military, afraid of getting caught or bent on just that, and figuring out who they really are now in this new context of discovery. Pretty depressing stuff to say the least.

In my opinion Steven Zeeland through these books is providing nothing more than yet another myth, another highly selective image, another porno anthology disguised as interview, another shallow surface view of Gay military personnel as salacious and exploitive as that of any of those Gay Pornographers that feed upon the young and naive from the local military posts and then litter the Internet with supposedly "straight" military guys "gettin it on!" This collection only represents the type of people Steven Zeeland liked, by his own admission. They represent the type of people whom Steven Zeeland would bed, by his own admission. It's the shallow end of the gene pool here people!

These books are not even of value as an example of HOW to survive being Gay in the military because quite a few of the guys get out almost immediately after these interviews take place... Or they are kicked out leaving you wondering about their bias and how negative their personal accounts were by their bad experience in the military. I'm no perfect example myself due to the simple fact that about a third of the way through my illustrious career I contracted HIV. Well, maybe I am a good example because that did put me under a microscope (More of a microscope than I was already under being a Submariner!) and showed me a hell of a lot of bad examples of bigots running around in uniform.

The secret to my success was pretty much that I kept to myself, which is not easy and I feel I missed out on a lot of closeness with my fellow shipmates. I refused a lot of invitations to go to parties and or celebrate holidays with my shipmates off base. I lived off base the first moment I could arrange it, living in the barracks I quickly found out puts you in view for other people to inspect your personal life out of uniform. I was very very careful, not about going out to a Gay bars in public or even dating local civilians, but about whom I got close to in the military. Everything I did was done at arms length and with the utmost professionalism I could muster. In uniform on base or on my boat was the safest most secure spot to be. I knew what was expected, who expected it, and how they expected it to be done. It was when you got out of uniform… that was the scary part.

The biggest "could have been" relationship I look back on was with a fellow Submariner Fire Control Technician whom I dated despite my personal rules and I fell madly in love with for about 6 months. We understood each other and shared that isolation we felt being Gay Submariners. He eventually was shipped out to another post and we consciously decided to end it quickly instead of dragging it out in some type of long distance nightmare of a relationship. He went boomers and I was fast attacks (Those are submarine types, and yes Sub Sailors lead very different lives.) and it was just not gonna happen. When I talk about personal sacrifice just being in the military as a Gay man this is an example of a personal sacrifice I feel most straight guys would never put up with. It’s not like you can get married and leverage base housing for your other half when you are Gay. We, meaning us military Gay guys and gals, made those sacrifices constantly. Living a schizophrenic life that isolates you at every level no matter how comfortable you are with yourself and your sexuality.

What you will not see in these books are interviews with the type of people I ran into, as an older more experienced Gay man, in the military who continually chose not to be predatory (Not to date or mess with people in my own boat or unit), who consciously decided to maintain my professionalism at all times, and who eventually met other Gay people who succeeded in having very long and very successful military careers following that same premise. People who, to this day, have my complete and utmost respect for making such a huge personal sacrifice to our country even in times of peace and who exemplify the best aspects of dedicated Gay military personnel and are virtually unknown despite how much they have contributed to the US military.

I think that's the image I would really want to leave with you instead of the seedy one that Steven Zeeland seems bent on showing you. That would be just the image of the Gay Master Chiefs and the Gay Senior Chiefs and the Gay Captains and the Gay Lieutenants I ran into who loved their jobs and honestly, with a straight face, believed in their service to our country so much they would hack off major portions of their personal lives in doing so and devote it to the concept of "We Protect Our Own".

On numerous occasions especially when I was stationed those final years of my enlistment in Washington DC and my civilian lover was dying from AIDS; paperwork would materialize out of nowhere approving leave time or phone calls would be made to excuse me from duty. It just happened, not because I asked for it, not because I expected it, not by this secret networked organization (Although we had some great parties.), but from a core of concerned individuals who all served for various reasons but towards the same purpose and who also understood our minority status in the organization they had dedicated so much of themselves to. Sailors and Marines who protected their own and who did so in some cases at risk to their own careers.

Change, from my experience, is taking place in the military regarding Gay people serving, change is slowly happening; it has to happen with so many Gay men and women in charge. It is just not going to come easily from some Executive Order or from some Legal Victory but from the inside like it probably should.

Tuesday, May 09, 2006

Movie Review: Brokeback Mountain

Brokeback_mountain_1

Yes Virginia, There Might Be Such A Thing As A Bi-sexual.

Seven members of the 82nd Airborne Division in Fort Bragg, North Carolina are facing charges connected with a military-themed gay porn Website. The price of straight men having on-camera sex with other men seems to be about $7,500 dollars in all. Nice thing to know I guess. The question is are any of these men really gay or were they role-playing for the cold hard cash? Are they buy-sexual? Is it really all that surprising a story with the military along with prisons, your local public restrooms and any frontier like environments, being isolated and sufficiently boring, are already well documented grey areas of situational homosexuality. Straight men doing nasty things with other guys? Oh my!

These are the questions I ask after all the hype is over, as my other half Jason commented "The fags got done fawning over this movie", after all the fingers get pointed and the awards handed out. Why in the hell is Brokeback Mountain, the movie at least, considered a great Gay Love Story? It's all about two uneducated guys with limited prospects who spend most of the cameras time in straight relationships having kids and doing all those domestic things we all consider pretty dang normal for straight men to do. Sure they are not all that successful at relationships with the women in their lives as much as their career choices but that's nothing new and it sure does not make them Gay in my eyes.

Brokeback Mountain is a somewhat slow movie at times showing a 20 year relationship between two ranchers that begins in 1963 and it's chock full of these small tidbits of interesting moments and real life complexities and consequences. This is definitely a movie to take the time to think about and not just enjoy for Director Ang Lee's glossy yet gorgeous mountain scenery juxtaposed with the authentic, seedy, poverty stricken small towns with hardened people populating a desolate internal landscape.

I was watching one of the DVD's special features about the making of Brokeback Mountain and one of the comments made about creating the screenplay from the original story struck me as this movies greatest weakness. The comment was they took Annie Proulx's story and fleshed out the domestic parts, they focused on the lives of the men with their wives and the emotional betrayal that took place. Not on the depth of emotions in these men and their feelings for each other or the evolution of their relationship.

Cowboys_truck

This is essentially a Gay movie for straight people and the men are played on screen as bi-sexual men in torment and denial over the whole Gay aspect of their feelings for each other. Well, at least Ennis is, Jack is always ready to give in and wants to enjoy their Gay relationship openly. This is still a love that dare not speak it's name.

Now admittedly this view I have of the movie is not what is written in the book due to the internal dialogs there that maps out both men's feelings on the relationship where Jack Twist played dead on by Jake Gyllenhaal is the optimistic, aggressive, and most likely homosexual man and Ennis Del Mar played by Heath Ledger is the uncertain and hands off, most likely bi-sexual, type guy. Ennis refuses to give into or admit the feelings he has for Jack Twist till the very end when it's too late. In the book this is the literary equivalent of a sucker punch and you come away from reading it with a great deal of tears. It's also interesting to note that even at the end of the book and the movie that Ennis Del Mar is not gonna go out and suddenly confess his love for another man to all his friends and family or find some other guy to shack up with like Jack Twist was intending to do.

Ennis Del Mar in the movie does finally accept he was in love with Jack, but not that he is Gay. In my opinion, Ennis is still just an unhappy bi-sexual man who only found real love and real friendship with another man. Is that too fine a point there? I think that is where the real discussion in this movie comes from.

I have said before when reviewing that wretched movie Denied. I honestly think that for the most part bi-sexuality, at least male bi-sexuality, these days gets used as an excuse by people, some of them real jerks, who are in denial or who have serious issues with being open about who they really are and making commitments to other people based on that knowledge. But... In Brokeback Mountain for the first time cinematically there seems to be a lot of room for real discussions on situational homosexuality. Could Ennis simply be in love with just Jack and in any other case would not have feelings for another man ever? Could this be grounds for that rare but much talked about male bi-sexual event to have occurred and a way of examining that choice?

Oh my. There I go stepping on the line of choice and Gay feelings. I believe right here in this movie there is just cause to talk about choices made and denial and what it does to people. What do you think would have been best for these guys and what would most likely the real world outcome have been?

I think we as adults should be able to talk about all that no matter how politically incorrect that discussion may be. It's better than overly simplifying complex human emotions with buzzwords and comic book mentality like using the term "Gay Cowboy Flick".

Great fiction and great movies leave you asking questions, sometimes uncomfortable questions, and thinking things through on your own. Brokeback Mountain is one of those movies.